ArticlePrimary health care research & development2025
Improving oral health service delivery: the patient perspective.
Article in Primary health care research & development, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRehabilitation with removable complete dentures (RCDs) involves navigating public dental systems that often present barriers like long wait times and limited access. While clinical outcomes are often known, patient experiences with service delivery remain underexplored. Understanding these experiences is key to improving denture care in public settings.
objectivesThis study aimed to explore and gain a comprehensive understanding of the service delivery experiences of patients rehabilitated with RCDs through the public dental health system in the State of Tasmania in Australia with the goal of informing improvements to the patient journey and overall service quality.
methodsA qualitative study using a Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) approach was undertaken. Twenty-five adult participants who received RCDs between 2017 and 2022 were purposively selected from public dental clinics. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured, face-to-face interviews. Analysis followed CGT principles, including iterative coding, constant comparison, memo writing, and the co-construction of meaning with participants.
resultsParticipants reported emotional distress linked to prolonged waiting times and limited continuity of care. Despite valuing the professionalism and empathy of individual practitioners, many expressed a need for improved communication, more coordinated interdisciplinary care, and greater system responsiveness. Good service was characterised by accessibility, affordability, approachability, friendly staff, and high-quality care. Suggestions for improvement included moving services close to patients, better integration with other health sectors, and the use of visual aids to support understanding and self-management.
conclusionsPatient narratives reveal a pressing need to address delays, communication gaps, and fragmented care in the public denture service pathway. System-level changes adopting a more holistic approach such as patient-centred approach, improving interprofessional collaboration, decentralising service provision, and enhancing health communication may significantly improve the denture rehabilitation experience and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.