ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026
Contributions of Sound Localization Cues to Azimuth Tuning in the Auditory Midbrain.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neurons in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus exhibit spatial receptive fields due to underlying neural sensitivity to acoustic cues that covary with sound source location, including interaural time difference (ITD), interaural level difference (ILD), and spectral shape and average acoustic gain within each ear. While neural sensitivity to individual cues is generally known, what remains unknown is how individual cues contribute to a neuron's receptive field when all cues are combined and how these contributions vary with the neuron's characteristic frequency (CF). In the present study, broadband noise stimuli were presented to awake rabbits of both sexes in virtual acoustic space using the rabbit's own head-related transfer functions. Contributions of each cue to the azimuth tuning curve (i.e., the receptive field within the front horizontal plane) were assessed by manipulating transfer functions to fix some cues while allowing others to vary naturally with azimuth. On average, firing rates of low-CF neurons (<2.8 kHz) were determined by the combination of ITD and one or more of ILD and individual-ear acoustic gains, whereas rates of high-CF neurons (>2.8 kHz) were largely determined by either ILD; contralateral-ear spectrum and ILD; or a combination of ITD and non-ITD cues, depending on whether source location was ipsilateral to the recording site, contralateral, or straight ahead, respectively. The CF transition coincided with the acoustic frequency above which the range of ILDs rapidly expands. Despite CF-dependent differences in the contributions of localization cues, rate sensitivity to azimuth was the same, on average, across the tonotopic axis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.