ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026
Sharpened Visual Memory Representations Are Reflected in Inferotemporal Cortex.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural representations of visual memory in inferotemporal cortex reveal a generalizable framework for translating between spikes and field potentials.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Neuronal signatures of successful one-shot memory in mid-level visual cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Resolving a paradox about how vision is transformed into familiarity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans and other primates can robustly report whether they have seen specific images before, even when those images are extremely similar to ones they have previously seen. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that pattern separation computations in the hippocampus (HC) contribute to this behavior by shaping the fidelity of visual memory. However, unclear is whether HC uniquely determines memory fidelity or whether computations in other brain areas also contribute. To investigate, we recorded neural signals from inferotemporal cortex (ITC) and HC of two rhesus monkeys (1 male, 1 female) as they performed a memory task in which they judged whether images were novel or exactly repeated in the presence of visually similar lure images with a range of visual similarities. We found behavioral evidence for sharpening, reflected as memory performance that was nonlinearly transformed relative to a benchmark defined by visual representations in ITC. As expected, we found that behavioral sharpening aligned with visual memory representations in HC. Surprisingly, and unaccounted for by HC pattern separation proposals, we also found neural correlates of behavioral sharpening reflected in ITC. These results, coupled with further analysis of the data, suggest that ITC contributes to shaping the fidelity of visual memory in the transformation from visual processing to memory storage and signaling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.