ArticleeNeuro2025
Individual Variation in Intrinsic Neuronal Properties of Nucleus Accumbens Core and Shell Medium Spiny Neurons in Male Rats Prone to Sign- or Goal-Track.
Article in eNeuro, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The "sign-tracking" and "goal-tracking" model of individual variation in associative learning permits the identification of rats with different cue reactivity and predisposition to addiction-like behaviors. Certainly, compared with "goal-trackers" (GTs), "sign-trackers" (STs) show more susceptibility traits such as increased cue-induced "relapse" of drugs of abuse. Different cue- and reward-evoked patterns of activity in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) have been a hallmark of the ST/GT phenotype. However, it is unknown whether differences in the intrinsic neuronal properties of NAc medium spiny neurons (MSNs) in the core and shell subregions are also a physiological correlate of these phenotypes. We performed whole-cell slice electrophysiology in outbred male rats and found that STs exhibited the lowest excitability in the NAc core, with lower number of action potentials and firing frequency as well as a blunted voltage/current relationship curve in response to hyperpolarized potentials in both the NAc core and shell. Although firing properties of shell MSNs did not differ between STs and GTs, intermediate responders that engage in both behaviors showed greater excitability compared with both STs and GTs. These findings suggest that intrinsic excitability in the NAc may contribute to individual differences in the attribution of incentive salience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.