Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41326156›Full record

ArticleHip & pelvis2025

Clinical Outcomes of the Cephalomedullary Nail with Supplementary Screws versus Multiple Cannulated Screws for Femoral Neck Fracture in Young and Active Patients.

Youg-Uk Kwon, Won-Hee Lee, Hyo-Young Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hip & pelvis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Youg-Uk KwonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0472-5044
Won-Hee LeeDepartment of Neuro Surgery, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3112-5354
Hyo-Young LeeDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6703-6142

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Several studies have compared various methods of treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF), including multiple cannulated screw fixation, in young and active patients. However, there have been few studies on the cephalomedullary nail with additional cannulated screw fixation in displaced FNF. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of the cephalomedullary nail technique with either a cannulated screw or multiple cannulated screw fixation in displaced FNF. Materials and Methods: Among 69 consecutive patients who underwent internal fixation for displaced FNF, 64 were included. Patients were divided into two groups. Patients in Group 1 underwent fixation utilizing a cephalomedullary nail with an additional screw. Group 2 patients underwent fixation utilizing a cephalomedullary nail with additional multiple cannulated screws. Radiologic and clinical outcomes were assessed at the final follow-up clinical appointment. Results: No significant difference was found in basic characteristics such as mean age, male to female ratio, and fracture classification between the study groups. The mean time to ambulation after surgery was significantly shorter in Group 1 ( Conclusion: In terms of enabling early ambulation in young and active patients, the cephalomedullary nailing with additional cannulated screws has the advantage in the management of displaced FNF. Furthermore, early ambulation lowers the rate of immobilization-related complications and shortens hospital stays.

Indexed as

Cephalomedullary nailingEarly ambulationFemoral neck fracturesOsteosynthesisPostoperative complications

Identifiers

PMID41326156
PMCPMC12702986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.