ArticleHip & pelvis2025
Risk Factors for Postoperative Stem Revision in Patients with Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures after Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Nationwide Outcomes Based on the Dutch Arthroplasty Registry.
Article in Hip & pelvis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to determine the incidence of postoperative primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) stem revision due to periprosthetic fractures (PPF) and analyze related patient and surgical factors. Materials and Methods: Utilizing the Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression method to identify risk factors for stem revision due to PPF, this study analyzed 331,009 primary THA procedures from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register between 2007 and 2021. Results: At 10-year follow-up, the incidence rate was 0.7%. Patient specific factors with significant incidence probabilities were higher age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.29 per 10 years, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-1.36), female sex (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.16-1.45), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class II (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.27-1.93) and ASA class III-IV (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.59-2.71), Charnley score B2 (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.23-1.72) and Charnley score C (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.26-2.59), and higher body mass index (BMI) (HR 1.02 per kg/m Conclusion: The highest risk of PPF in THA requiring stem revision was found in older female patients with high ASA class, Charnley score and BMI as well as uncemented implants. This result may prompt surgeons to strive for cemented stem fixation in patients with declining bone stock when feasible. Furthermore, care should be taken when using anterior approaches for patients with specific risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.