ArticleHip & pelvis2025
Spinal Anesthesia in Same-Day Discharge Total Hip Arthroplasty: Chloroprocaine versus Mepivacaine.
Article in Hip & pelvis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimizing Early Recovery Quality in Same-Day Discharge Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Chloroprocaine spinal anesthetic may facilitate quicker postoperative recovery in total hip arthroplasty (THA) than mepivacaine due to its shorter duration of action and rapid metabolization, which could reduce time to ambulation and discharge. Given the increasing emphasis on same-day discharge (SDD) protocols in THA to improve efficiency and reduce healthcare costs, evaluating the impact of chloroprocaine on discharge timing and postoperative outcomes is critical. This study compared the clinical outcomes and safety of chloroprocaine compared to mepivacaine in SDD primary THA. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study compared the spinal anesthesia used on 226 patients who underwent primary THA performed between November 2020 to June 2023. The surgical outcomes of chloroprocaine (n=97) versus mepivacaine (n=129) spinal anesthesia, including estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, discharge time, and 90-day readmissions or emergency department visits, were assessed. Anesthesia-related complications such as hypotension, bradycardia, urinary retention, and post anesthesia care unit outcomes were also documented. Results: Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The chloroprocaine group had significantly lower EBL, shorter operative times, and faster discharge times. No significant differences were observed between groups in anesthesia complications or postoperative nausea, vomiting, or headaches. Additionally, there were no differences in surgical complications. Conclusion: For direct anterior approach primary THA, chloroprocaine spinal anesthesia was associated with reduced blood loss, shorter operative times, and faster SDD, with no cases of unplanned direct admissions. These results indicate that chloroprocaine spinal anesthesia can be utilized as a safe and effective alternative to mepivacaine in outpatient THA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.