Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41326053›Full record

ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2025

Standard pulmonary function tests and respiratory oscillometry patterns in hypersensitivity pneumonitis and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Joyce K Y Wu, Jessica Jia-Ni Xu, Tadahisa Numakura, Clodagh M Ryan, Micheal Chad McInnis, Matthew Binnie, Shane Shapera, Jolene H Fisher, Zoltán Hantos, Chung-Wai Chow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Joyce K Y WuToronto General-Pulmonary Function Laboratory, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4113-2531
Jessica Jia-Ni XuDivision of Respirology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tadahisa NumakuraDivision of Respirology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Clodagh M RyanToronto General-Pulmonary Function Laboratory, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Micheal Chad McInnisUniversity Medical Imaging Toronto, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Matthew BinnieDivision of Respirology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shane ShaperaDivision of Respirology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jolene H FisherDivision of Respirology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Zoltán HantosDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Chung-Wai ChowDivision of Respirology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Chung-Wai.Chow@uhn.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9344-8522

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is an interstitial lung disease (ILD) caused by repeated exposure to inhaled antigens, leading to small airway and parenchymal inflammation. Diagnosis is based on a detailed clinical history, chest imaging and invasive tests such as bronchoalveolar lavage. Distinguishing HP from other ILDs is challenging. Respiratory oscillometry, a novel pulmonary function test (PFT), is highly sensitive to small airway abnormalities. Oscillometry measurement of reactance is strongly correlated with gender-age-physiology score, a prognostic tool used to predict mortality and disease severity in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).

objectiveTo determine if oscillometry and standard PFT patterns are different in HP and IPF.

methods39 HP (79.5% with fibrotic HP) were enrolled from October 2022 to December 2023 for oscillometry before clinically-indicated standard PFTs and compared with 39 age-matched and sex-matched patients with IPF who also had same day oscillometry and standard PFTs. The main oscillometry metrics of interest were R5-19 (the difference in resistance from 5 to 19 Hz, a metric of small airway function and ventilatory inhomogeneity that increases with worsening respiratory mechanics), X5 (reactance at 5 Hz) which primarily reflects respiratory elastance and AX (area of reactance), a summative measure of the respiratory system stiffness across a range of frequencies, that behaves similarly but in opposite direction to X5.

resultsPatients with HP exhibited higher residual volume/total lung capacity (RV/TLC), lower per cent predicted (%) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV

conclusionGas trapping (RV/TLC>0.40) is a feature of HP not observed in IPF. The strong correlations of RV/TLC with AX, X5 and R5-19 suggest that oscillometry can provide non-invasive markers of small airway obstruction in HP that can differentiate it from IPF.

Indexed as

Alveolitis, Extrinsic AllergicIdiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisOscillometryRespiratory Function TestsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedIdiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisInterstitial FibrosisRespiratory Function Test

Identifiers

PMID41326053
PMCPMC12684087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.