[Application of multidisciplinary team diagnosis and treatment model in the management of patients with combined burns and heat stroke].

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. [Multidisciplinary integration in the diagnosis and treatment in burns and wound repair surgery: current status, challenges, and future].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2025
   Review
2. [Analyzing the multidisciplinary strategies for diagnosis and treatment of patients with burns and trauma from a management perspective].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2025
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as