Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41326031›Full record

ArticleZhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi2025

[Analyzing the multidisciplinary strategies for diagnosis and treatment of patients with burns and trauma from a management perspective].

H Chen

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

H ChenDepartment of Burn and Plastic Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100035, China.

Funding

Capital's Health Development Research Fund-Major Project 2024-1G-2071High-Level Public Health Technical Talent Development Program-Training Program 01-29
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with burns and trauma often have complex conditions that require multidisciplinary diagnosis and treatment as a single discipline is insufficient to meet the needs of modern medical goals. Multidisciplinary team (MDT) collaborative diagnosis and treatment, as an important model for solving this problem, faces challenges such as the lack of initiation mechanisms, loose process management, and absence of value-based incentives in practical clinical applications. From a management perspective, this article analyzes the essential differences between MDT collaborative diagnosis and treatment for burn and trauma patients and traditional consultations, and explores the core issues from the technical level to management innovation, including leveraging on the advance technologies of burn discipline, relying on the strong disciplines of medical institutions, integrating disciplines centered on patients, optimizing processes with management as a link, and driving long-term operation with performance-based incentives. The aim is to provide strategic references for the effective implementation of MDT collaborative diagnosis and treatment for burn and trauma patients.

Indexed as

BurnsPatient Care TeamWounds and InjuriesHumans

Identifiers

PMID41326031
PMCPMC12672140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.