Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41325993›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Directors Association2026

Changes in Patient Medical Complexity After Skilled Nursing Facility Payment Reform: A Qualitative Study.

Natalie E Leland, Rachel A Prusynski, Amanda Shore, Harsha Amaravadi, Tracy Mroz, Debra Saliba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Natalie E LelandDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: nel24@pitt.edu.
Rachel A PrusynskiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Amanda ShoreDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Harsha AmaravadiDepartment of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Tracy MrozDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Health Systems and Population Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Debra SalibaBorun Center, Division of Geriatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; RAND Health, Santa Monica, CA, USA.

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001857 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2016 to 2025
$129.3M
The impact of post acute care payment changes on access and outcomesR01AG065371 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI LELAND, NATALIE ELIZABETH, MROZ, TRACY MITCHELL · 2021 to 2024
$2.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001857NIA NIH HHS R01 AG065371
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe skilled nursing facility (SNF) patient-driven payment model (PDPM) is intended to align payment with patient clinical characteristics to more accurately compensate complex and resource intensive care. However, it is unclear whether and how SNFs shifted their admission practices to align PDPM's financial incentives. This study examined SNF leaders' perspectives on changes in admission practices and patient case mix in order to understand variation in responses to PDPM implementation.

designA qualitative study. SETTING AND

participantsA purposive sample of SNF leaders from across the United States [eg, average to high (3-5 stars) and below-average (1-2 stars) care quality].

methodsNinety-four SNF leaders participated in one-on-one semistructured interviews between January 2021 and December 2022. Thematic analysis examined leaders' perspectives of their organization's response to PDPM, including changes in admission practices and patient case mix, as well as contextual factors contributing to their response. We then examined patterns by SNF quality rating and admission practice changes.

resultsDescriptions of whether and why SNF case mix change differed based on their history of caring for a medically complex patient population. Leaders of SNFs that historically cared for rehabilitation patients frequently described strategic changes in their admission practices (eg, enhanced preadmission screening) after PDPM to prioritize the admission of medically complex patients, including those with higher nursing-related care needs (eg, tracheostomy, wounds, peritoneal dialysis). These leaders tended to represent average or high-quality SNFs, whereas leaders from below-average quality SNFs more frequently reported minimal or no case mix changes, in part reflecting a history of admitting medically complex patients before PDPM. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Results suggest that PDPM's intended effect of shifting SNF admissions to more medically complex patients varied by baseline SNF admission patterns and characteristics. These findings can inform longitudinal national evaluations of organizational responses to PDPM implementation.

Indexed as

Reimbursement MechanismsSkilled Nursing FacilitiesFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchUnited Stateshealth care reformMedicareNursing homespatient acuitypatient admission

Identifiers

PMID41325993
PMCPMC13051348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.