Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41325644›Full record

ArticlePerfusion2026

Dabigatran-idarucizumab pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics in sheep undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass.

Michael P Eaton, Sergiy M Nadtochiy, Tatsiana Stefanos, Brian J Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perfusion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael P EatonUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
Sergiy M NadtochiyUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
Tatsiana StefanosUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
Brian J AndersonDepartment Anesthesiology, University of Auckland, Auckland¸ New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-2826-3019

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundThe effect of the anticoagulant, dabigatran, and its antagonist, idarucizumab, on coagulation remains poorly quantified. There are few pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic data available to describe the interaction in humans or animals undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass.MethodsSix sheep were given intravenous dabigatran infusion while undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. Blood samples were collected for thromboelastographic reaction time (R-time) and drug assay at 1. 5, 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after starting dabigatran. Further reaction times were measured at 1 min, 5 min, 15 min, 60 min, 4 h and 24 h after initiation of idarucizumab infusion. Plasma dabigatran concentrations, the dabigatran- idarucizumab interaction and R-times were analyzed using an integrated pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model with non-linear mixed effects.ResultsA 2-compartment model described dabigatran pharmacokinetics with a clearance (CL 0.0509 L/min/70 kg), intercompartment clearance (Q 0.229 L/min/70 kg), central volume of distribution (V1 3.89 L/70 kg), peripheral volume of distribution (V2 11.4 L/70 kg). The peripheral volume was 2.25 times larger during bypass. The effect compartment model estimates for an E

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntithrombinsCardiopulmonary BypassDabigatranAnimalsBlood CoagulationSheepAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntithrombinsDabigatranidarucizumabcardiopulmonary bypasscoagulationdabigatranidarucizumabpharmacodynamicspharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID41325644
PMCPMC13323899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.