Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41325641›Full record

ArticleAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2025

Barriers and facilitators to nicotine and cannabis vaping cessation among young adults: a qualitative study using Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, and Behavior (COM-B) model and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF).

Nhung Nguyen, Jason M Satterfield, Salomeh Keyhani, Gregory M Marcus, Pamela M Ling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nhung NguyenHEARTY Lab, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94158, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8661-9597
Jason M SatterfieldDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94115, United States.
Salomeh KeyhaniCenter for Data to Discovery and Delivery Innovation (3DI) San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, 94121, United States.
Gregory M MarcusDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94117, United States.
Pamela M LingCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, United States.

Funding

Developing a smartphone-based intervention targeting high-risk situations of nicotine vaping among young adultsK01DA056693 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Nhung Nguyen · 2024 to 2026
$575k
California Tobacco-Related Disease Research ProgramNIDA NIH HHS K01 DA056693NIDA NIH HHS K01DA056693NIH
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite young adults' growing use of nicotine and cannabis vaporized products (vaping), little is known about factors influencing vaping cessation. PURPOSE: Identify barriers and facilitators to nicotine and/or cannabis vaping cessation among young adults (18-29 years old).

methodsWe conducted a thematic analysis of interviews with 20 California young adults (mean age = 22.8, racially and ethnically diverse) who vaped nicotine and/or cannabis (specifically delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol or THC) in 2024-2025. We mapped cessation-related barriers and facilitators to Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, and Behavior model and Theoretical Domains Framework.

resultsYoung adults expressed stronger motivation to stop vaping nicotine than cannabis. Psychological Capability barriers involved a lack of self-control over nicotine vaping. Physical Opportunity factors, such as product accessibility and treatment unaffordability, hindered quitting, while the cost burden of vaporized products was a facilitator. Social Opportunity included both barriers (ie, socialization) and facilitators (ie, protection of loved ones or relationships). Automatic Motivation barriers included habitual use and addiction, while negative emotion toward vaping harms facilitated quitting. Reflective Motivation included the most identified factors for barriers (eg, low perceived risk of vaping, coping with mental health, and personal identity linked to vaping) and facilitators (eg, quitting desire and concerns about health and vaporized product quality). Most factors influencing vaping cessation overlapped for nicotine and cannabis. Substance-specific barriers for nicotine (ie, self-control, oral fixation, and flavor appeal) and cannabis (ie, perceived benefits) were identified.

conclusionsFindings provide insights into potential targets for future interventions to help young adults quit vaping nicotine and/or cannabis.

Indexed as

MotivationNicotineVapingAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleModels, PsychologicalQualitative ResearchYoung AdultNicotineco-usemarijuanaquittingtobaccotreatmentyouth

Identifiers

PMID41325641
PMCPMC12668677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.