Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41325595›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2025

Adolescent Voices in Action-Co-Designing Digital Sexual and Reproductive Health Knowledge Translation Interventions: Community-Based Participatory Action Project.

Salima Meherali, Amyna Ismail Rehmani, Mariam Ahmad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Salima Meherali *Faculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8132-8600
Amyna Ismail Rehmani *Faculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4434-8941
Mariam Ahmad *Faculty of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID 0009-0002-2893-6946

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescents need comprehensive education and resources to promote their sexual and reproductive health (SRH) and make informed decisions about their SRH. However, many adolescents fail to secure an opportunity to learn accurate and reliable SRH information, as they face sociocultural barriers, fear of prejudice, and societal stigma. Information available on digital platforms may not always be evidence-based and can further spread misinformation. Digital knowledge translation interventions that provide evidence-based SRH information in North America are limited.

objectiveThis study aimed to co-design a digital knowledge translation intervention, reflective of adolescents' voices, to provide evidence-based, accessible, and accurate SRH resources.

methodsWe conducted a large multisite project across 3 cities in Canada. Using a community-based participatory approach and principles of human-centered design, we established adolescent advisory groups (AAGs) to actively engage them in the design, development, and implementation of the intervention.

resultsA total of 26 participants were recruited from Edmonton, Vancouver, and Toronto to be part of the advisory groups. AAG members participated in design-thinking sessions to brainstorm ideas for website design, identify informational needs for content development, provide iterative feedback on the design of the intervention, and suggest strategies to improve engagement and interaction. With their input, 6 priority areas were identified to develop SRH resources (ie, puberty, menstruation, sexually transmitted infections, healthy relationships, sexual assault, and contraception). Their feedback informed the design's language, visual appeal, and engagement factors. To promote meaningful engagement of AAGs at each step, we used strategies such as gamification activities, group discussions, and flexible scheduling, resulting in high retention and ownership of the process among AAG members.

conclusionsCo-designing with adolescents strengthened the intervention's cultural relevance, youth-friendliness, and credibility. Our process emphasizes the significance of involving adolescents in co-designing SRH interventions, which results in more meaningful, long-term, and youth-friendly solutions.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeReproductive HealthSexual HealthTranslational Research, BiomedicalAdolescentCanadaCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFemaleHumansMaleco-designdigital interventionsknowledge translationsexual and reproductive healthyouth-friendly

Identifiers

PMID41325595
PMCPMC12706438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.