ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2025
SmokeBERT: A Bidirectional Encoder Representations From Transformers-Based Model for Quantitative Smoking History Extraction From Clinical Narratives to Improve Lung Cancer Screening.
Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Leveraging large language models to extract smoking history from clinical notes for lung cancer surveillance.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTobacco use is a major risk factor for diseases such as cancer. Granular quantitative details of smoking (eg, pack years and years since quitting) are essential for assessing disease risk and determining eligibility for lung cancer screening (LCS). However, existing natural language processing (NLP) tools struggle to extract detailed quantitative smoking data from clinical narratives.
methodsWe cross-validated four pretrained Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT)-based models-BERT, BioBERT, ClinicalBERT, and MedBERT-by fine-tuning them on 90% of 3,261 sentences mentioning smoking history to extract six quantitative smoking history variables from clinical narratives. The model with the highest cross-validated micro-averaged F1 scores across most variables was selected as the final SmokeBERT model and was further fine-tuned on the 90% training data. Model performance was evaluated on a 10% holdout test set and an external validation set containing 3,191 sentences.
resultsClinicalBERT was selected as the final model based on cross-validation and was fine-tuned on the training data to create the SmokeBERT model. Compared with the state-of-the-art rule-based NLP model and the Generative Pre-trained Transformer Open Source Series 20 billion parameter model, SmokeBERT demonstrated superior performance in smoking data extraction (overall F1 score, holdout test: 0.97
conclusionWe developed SmokeBERT, a fine-tuned BERT-based model optimized for extracting detailed quantitative smoking histories. Future work includes evaluating performance on larger clinical data sets and developing a multilingual, language-agnostic version of SmokeBERT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.