Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41325570›Full record

ReviewBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud2025

Exploring the intersection of climate change, gender, and food security in Latin America

Natalia Cediel-Becerra, Diana Sánchez-Arévalo

Abstract readReviewEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Review in Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Natalia Cediel-BecerraFacultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad de La Salle, Bogotá, D. C., Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-8141-8502
Diana Sánchez-ArévaloFacultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad de La Amazonía, Florencia, Caquetá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-3289-4905

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The consequences of climate change for women in Latin American countries are more severe due to persistent gaps in education, land ownership and access to information services. These inequities heighten health, welfare and livelihood risks among rural women. Objective: To describe the relationship between climate change and food security from a gender perspective in Latin America. Materials and methods: An exploratory review was conducted in Redalyc, SciELO, Google Scholar, EBSCO, Web of Science and Scopus. We analyzed 36 documents published between 2010 and 2022 focusing on Latin American countries Results: he most frequently described extreme events were droughts, floods, rising temperatures, and landslides, all of which contributed to food supply shortages. Evidence shows persistent gaps in health, access to resources and information, security and human rights, which perpetuate social vulnerability and hinder the effectiveness of public policies addressing the impacts of climate change and the social consequences of the pandemic. Climate-related risks are particularly severe for indigenous and Afro-descendant women and girls, older women, LGBTIQ+ people, women with disabilities, women in migration contexts, and those living in rural, remote or disaster- and conflict-prone areas. Conclusions: Climate change is not gender-neutral, and there remains a gap in the implementation of gender-sensitive climate adaptation policies.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeFood SecurityFood SupplyFemaleHumansLatin AmericaMaleSex Factorsadaptationclimate changeequityfood supplygender identityLatin America

Identifiers

PMID41325570
PMCPMC12846743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.