ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2025
Materials Dual-Source Knowledge Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Local Large Language Models in Photocatalysts.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A dual-mode large language model assistant for on-surface reactionsChemical science · 2026Article
- Sustainable Materials Design With Multi-Modal Artificial Intelligence.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to serve as collaborative assistants in scientific research. However, adapting them to specialized domains is difficult because it requires the integration of domain-specific knowledge. We propose Materials Dual-Source Knowledge Retrieval-Augmented Generation (MDSK-RAG), a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) framework that enables domain specialization of LLMs for materials development under fully offline (no-Internet) operation to ensure data confidentiality. The framework unifies two complementary knowledge sources, experimental CSV data (practical knowledge) and scientific PDF literature (theoretical insights), by converting tabular records into template-based text, retrieving relevant passages from each source, summarizing them with a local LLM, and merging the summaries with the user query prior to generation. As a case study, we applied the framework to metal-sulfide photocatalysts using 740 in-house experimental records and 20 scientific PDFs. We evaluated the framework on a benchmark consisting of 14 expert-defined questions and used two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for paired comparisons. Models with fewer than 10 billion parameters were executed on a laptop, whereas larger models were run on a dedicated local server; the cloud-based LLM (GPT-4o) was evaluated via the cloud service. For practical deployment, gemma-2-9b-it (<10 billion parameters) was chosen as the primary local model; we additionally tested Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct and a larger gemma-2-27b-it to assess model choice and scalability. For gemma-2-9b-it, the framework increased the median cosine similarity to expert reference answers from 0.63 to 0.71, an absolute increase of 0.08 (corresponding to a relative percentage gain of 12.70%; Wilcoxon signed-rank test statistic:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.