Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41325498›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

A reliable in vitro rumen culture system and workflow for screening anti-methanogenic compounds.

Philip P Laric, Armina Mortazavi, Ewa Węgrzyn, Kathrin Simon, Pauline S Rittel, Florian M Trefz, Benedikt Sabass

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Philip P LaricDepartment of Veterinary Science, LMU Munich, Germany.
Armina MortazaviDepartment of Veterinary Science, LMU Munich, Germany.
Ewa WęgrzynInstitute for Chemical Epigenetics (ICEM), LMU Munich, Germany.
Kathrin SimonDepartment of Veterinary Science, LMU Munich, Germany.
Pauline S RittelDepartment of Veterinary Science, LMU Munich, Germany.
Florian M TrefzClinic for Ruminants with Outpatient Clinic and Herd Management, Center for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, LMU Munich, Oberschleißheim, Germany.
Benedikt SabassDepartment of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7769-8043

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arguably the biggest man-made challenge of the century is halting climate change. Livestock's methane (CH4) emissions, a greenhouse gas with a higher global warming potential than carbon dioxide (CO2), represent a prime target for reducing anthropogenic impact. While the reduction of enteric methane emissions through feed additives has been demonstrated, potent and affordable compounds inhibiting methanogenesis in ruminants are not yet well established. Reliable methods for reproducible cultivation of the rumen microbiome in the laboratory are an essential tool for the study of methanogenesis. We have developed a versatile setup that allows for the cultivation of the ruminal microbiome in a benchtop configuration and combines, miniaturizes, and improves existing systems. The design is based on standard laboratory equipment, including bottles, serological pipettes, tubing, and Luer-Lock valves. The apparatus enables long-term cultivation of primary cultures extracted from the rumen of slaughtered cattle. We describe rumen content acquisition, preparation, the cultivation procedure, and demonstrate the system's performance. The efficacy of the system is demonstrated through the administration of various concentrations of state-of-the-art methanogenesis inhibitors. These inhibitors include lyophilized Asparagopsis taxiformis (AT), bromoform (BF), iodoform (IF), 3-nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP), rapeseed oil, and BF dissolved in rapeseed oil, with maximum CH4 reductions of 96.29% (p = 5.00E-05, Cohen's d = 30.29), 98.22% (p = 2.88E-05, d = 23.07), 96.26% (p = 1.03E-05, d = 30.29), 74.63% (p = 8.88E-05, d = 13.32), 28.96% (p = 0.001, d = 3.99), and 98.51% (p = 4.18E-06, d = 39.94), respectively, in comparison to the negative control. The gas production dynamics in our setup align with previously published results, which supports the validity of the system. Compared to conventional methodologies, the described setup offers enhanced versatility and ease of use. Furthermore, Fourier-transform-infrared-spectroscopy is implemented in a novel and low-cost approach for quantifying CH₄ and CO₂ in the headspace gas. Together, these methodological advances provide an accessible and reproducible platform for long-term in vitro rumen cultivation for the screening of anti-methanogenic additives.

Indexed as

MethaneRumenAnimalsCattleWorkflowMethane

Identifiers

PMID41325498
PMCPMC12668615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.