Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41325486›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

eDNA reveals spatial differences in species composition of protected rockfishes.

Stephanie A Matthews, Olivia M Scott, Meredith V Everett, Megan R Shaffer, Elizabeth Andruszkiewicz Allan, Andrew O Shelton, Gregory D Williams, Abigail Wells, Krista M Nichols, Ryan P Kelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Stephanie A MatthewsSchool of Marine and Environmental Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9331-3521
Olivia M ScottSchool of Marine and Environmental Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5789-1733
Meredith V EverettConservation Biology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Megan R ShafferSchool of Marine and Environmental Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7419-3218
Elizabeth Andruszkiewicz AllanSchool of Marine and Environmental Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Andrew O SheltonConservation Biology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Gregory D WilliamsPacific States Marine Fisheries Commission, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Abigail WellsConservation Biology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Krista M NicholsConservation Biology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Ryan P KellySchool of Marine and Environmental Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rare species are difficult and time-consuming to detect, but environmental DNA (eDNA) methods can be used to increase data availability for monitoring and management. Here, we use the diverse rockfish species flock (genus Sebastes) to demonstrate the utility of eDNA as a tool for detecting rare and difficult to observe species in the marine environment. We describe the identification of a phylogenetically informative gene region for eDNA metabarcoding which uniquely identifies 93 of the 109 Sebastes species currently described. We then use this assay to differentiate rockfish communities in field samples collected from two sub-basins within Puget Sound in Washington, USA. Across three field sampling platforms, we found that sample collection location (distance from seafloor) has substantial impacts on rates of detection and on the diversity of species detected, likely reflecting the habitat preferences of the target species. This metabarcoding region provides an important tool for rockfish monitoring, both within Puget Sound and across the North Pacific. More generally, this work speaks to the usefulness of eDNA data as a tool for the conservation and management of rare and difficult-to-distinguish species.

Indexed as

DNA, EnvironmentalFishesPerciformesAnimalsBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicEcosystemPhylogenySpecies SpecificityWashingtonDNA, Environmental

Identifiers

PMID41325486
PMCPMC12668609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.