Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41325439›Full record

Trial reportPsychotherapy and psychosomatics2026

Walk and Talk: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Multi-Modal Motion-Assisted Memory Desensitization and Reconsolidation Therapy versus Treatment as Usual for Veterans and First Responders with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

Mirjam J Nijdam, Pia Goorden, Irene J M Martens, Rick de Haart, Nicola S Klein, Stijn B Peeters, Martin L Waagemans, Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen, Dorien de Groot, Eric Vermetten

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Post-traumatic stress disorder.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mirjam J NijdamARQ National Psychotrauma Center, Diemen, The Netherlands.
Pia GoordenARQ National Psychotrauma Center, Diemen, The Netherlands.
Irene J M MartensARQ National Psychotrauma Center, Diemen, The Netherlands.
Rick de HaartDepartment Trauma Center, GGZ Drenthe Mental Health Institute, Beilen, The Netherlands.
Nicola S KleinDepartment Trauma Center, GGZ Drenthe Mental Health Institute, Beilen, The Netherlands.
Stijn B PeetersErasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Martin L WaagemansDepartment of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leona Hakkaart-van RoijenErasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Dorien de GrootDepartment Trauma Center, GGZ Drenthe Mental Health Institute, Beilen, The Netherlands.
Eric VermettenDepartment of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands, e.vermetten@lumc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

<p>Introduction: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) presents a significant challenge within the treatment of mental health issues, particularly in veterans and first responders who often experience resistance to standard treatments. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a virtual reality exposure-based treatment with motion as compared to treatment as usual (TAU), as first-line treatment for PTSD within these populations.

methodsThis multicenter, parallel, single-blind, non-inferiority randomized controlled trial was conducted in three centers across the Netherlands. We included adults diagnosed with occupational or combat-related PTSD, without prior treatment history. Participants were randomized (1:1) to receive either manualized multi-modal motion-assisted memory desensitization and reconsolidation (3MDR) therapy or manualized regular trauma-focused psychotherapy (TAU). 3MDR was applied in fewer sessions than TAU. Primary outcome was self-reported PTSD severity, based on the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5, assessed at baseline, post-treatment, 3 and 6 months post-treatment. Secondary outcomes were clinician-rated PTSD, avoidance, comorbid disorders and symptoms, and functioning. The trial was prospectively registered in the Dutch Trial Register, NL-OMON55588.

resultsBetween February 15, 2018, and July 22, 2022, 134 participants with PTSD were enrolled, with 67 (50%) randomized to 3MDR and 67 (50%) to TAU of whom 106 (79%) were veterans, and 28 (21%) were first responders. Significant time effects were demonstrated in self-reported and clinician-rated PTSD severity for both groups, as well as in avoidance, comorbid disorders, and functioning. At 6 months post-treatment, 3MDR proved to be non-inferior to TAU in terms of self-reported PTSD (mean difference = -2.91 [95% CI -7.92, 2.10], p = 0.25).

conclusion3MDR demonstrates to be an effective alternative first-line treatment for PTSD stemming from occupational traumatic events. Even though it leans on infrastructure with a treadmill and other hardware components, it may offer an alternative over conventional trauma-focused psychotherapies for PTSD that yields savings of a quarter of time spent within therapy. </p>.

Indexed as

Stress Disorders, Post-TraumaticVeteransVirtual Reality Exposure TherapyAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeImmersionPosttraumatic stress disorderPsychotherapyRandomized controlled trialVirtual realityWalking

Identifiers

PMID41325439
PMCPMC12707896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.