ArticlePLoS computational biology2025
A unified model library maps how neuromodulation reshapes the excitability landscape of neurons across the brain.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The activity of neurons in the central nervous system changes drastically across different states like asleep or awake, attentive or drowsy, behaving or resting. Neuromodulation supports these changes by altering neuronal excitability. Much work has been devoted to understanding the effects of neuromodulators on various neurons. However, we still lack a cohesive picture of how neuromodulation affects neuronal dynamics. Here, we provide an analytical framework to characterise neuromodulation. First, we analyse electrophysiological data from published papers and extract features for seven types of neurons from five areas of the human and rodent central nervous system, under the effect of five neuromodulators. Second, we describe this data using the widespread, simple, yet biologically accurate, Adaptive Exponential Integrate-and-Fire model (AdEx). Third, we use a dimensionality reduction technique to study the parameter space of the control and neuromodulated conditions. Fourth, we examine the dynamics of each neuromodulator through bifurcation and phase-plane analyses. Our analyses revealed that: (i) different neuromodulators remap the parameters space of neurons into non-overlapping clusters, (ii) changes in electrophysiological properties induced by neuromodulators can be explained by transitions between dynamical regimes in the excitability landscape of neurons, and (iii) there are only two distinct neuromodulatory effects: "switching" - changing the spiking behaviour - and "scaling" - strengthening or weakening an existing behaviour. Leveraging this framework, we estimated the effect of neuromodulation in one species using data from another species.This study provides an integrative perspective on neuromodulation, offering experimenters and theoreticians a compact description of its impact on neuronal activity. The open-source Python-based workflow is modular and readily applicable to other datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.