ArticlePloS one2025
A novel framework for educational Q&A: Leveraging RAG and Code Interpreters for knowledge retrieval and logical computation.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a novel approach to enhancing educational question-answering (Q&A) systems by combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Large Language Model (LLM) Code Interpreters. Traditional educational Q&A systems face challenges in areas such as knowledge updates, reasoning accuracy, and the handling of complex computational tasks. These limitations are particularly evident in domains requiring multi-step reasoning or access to real-time, domain-specific knowledge. To address these issues, we propose a system that utilizes RAG to dynamically retrieve up-to-date, relevant information from external knowledge sources, thus mitigating the common "hallucination" problem in LLMs. Additionally, the integration of an LLM Code Interpreter enables the system to perform multi-step logical reasoning and execute Python code for precise calculations, significantly improving its ability to solve mathematical problems and handle complex queries. We evaluated our proposed system on five educational datasets-AI2_ARC, OpenBookQA, E-EVAL, TQA, and ScienceQA-which represent diverse question types and domains. Compared to vanilla Large Language Models (LLMs), our approach combining Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) with Code Interpreters achieved an average accuracy improvement of 10-15 percentage points. Among tested models, GPT-4o and Gemini-pro-1.5 consistently showed the strongest performance, excelling particularly in scientific reasoning, multi-step computations. Despite these advancements, we identify several challenges that remain, including knowledge retrieval failures, code execution errors, difficulties in synthesizing cross-disciplinary information, and limitations in multi-modal reasoning, particularly when combining text and images. These challenges provide important directions for future research aimed at further optimizing educational Q&A systems. Our work shows that integrating RAG and Code Interpreters offers a promising path toward more accurate, transparent, and personalized educational Q&A systems, and can significantly improve the learning experience in various educational contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.