Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41325389›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Using pre-training and interaction modeling for ancestry-specific disease prediction using multiomics data from the UK Biobank.

Thomas Le Menestrel, Erin Craig, Robert Tibshirani, Trevor Hastie, Manuel Rivas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas Le MenestrelInstitute for Computational and Mathematical Engineering (ICME), School of Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5901-6407
Erin CraigDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Robert TibshiraniDepartment of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Trevor HastieDepartment of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Manuel RivasDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.

Funding

SOFTWARE FOR LARGE-SCALE INFERENCE OF THE GENETICS OF LIFESTYLE MEASURES, BIOMARKERS, AND COMMON AND RARE DISEASESR01HG010140 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KUNDAJE, ANSHUL, MONTGOMERY, STEPHEN · 2018 to 2022
$2.0M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have uncovered the genetic basis of complex traits, but show an under-representation of non-European descent individuals, underscoring a critical gap in genetic research. Prediction models trained primarily on European ancestry often fail to generalize to diverse populations, leading to reduced accuracy and potential health disparities. Here, we assess whether incorporating interaction modeling and pretraining into disease prediction models can improve performance. We evaluated the performance of Group-LASSO INTERaction-NET (glinternet) and pretrained lasso in disease prediction focusing on diverse ancestries in the UK Biobank. Models were trained on multiomic data from White British and other ancestries and validated in a cohort of more than 96,000 individuals for 8 diseases. Of the 96 trained models, we report 16 with statistically significant incremental predictive performance in terms of ROC-AUC scores ([Formula: see text]), found for diabetes, arthritis, gall stones, cystitis, asthma, and osteoarthritis. Our findings suggest that interaction terms and pre-training can modestly improve prediction accuracy, but these effects are not consistent across all diseases. Our code is available at (https://github.com/rivas-lab/AncestryOmicsUKB).

Indexed as

Biological Specimen BanksGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMultiomicsUK BiobankUnited KingdomWhite People

Identifiers

PMID41325389
PMCPMC12668563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.