ArticlePloS one2025
Network vulnerability of cattle movement in Minas Gerais, Brazil, from 2013 to 2022.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The analysis of networks from cattle movements is an important approach to investigate areas and premises where disease outbreaks can occur and be contained. Vulnerability analysis allows a more profound understanding of the network by combining network measures with the strategic removal of nodes, helping to identify more vulnerable areas and the best metrics to support disease control planning. Therewith, the aim of this study was to analyze the network vulnerability of cattle movements from 2013 to 2022, in Minas Gerais, Brazil and to identify the spatial spreaders into the network to improve infectious disease control programs by targeted risk-based surveillance and intervention. The vulnerability was calculated considering the graphs diameter and the spatial spreaders with a threshold distance of 300 km, for incoming (IN) and outgoing (OUT) movements. Additionally, a risk-based analysis was performed in the more vulnerable region. The results showed Triângulo Mineiro/ Alto Paranaíba with higher vulnerability and many IN spatial spreaders, as well as Vale do Mucurí region with many OUT spatial spreaders. The risk-based analysis revealed betweenness and out degree as the most effective measures to be considered for intervention. Therefore, the vulnerability analysis and the spatial spreader were observed as great tools for risk-based interventions and surveillance. Furthermore, Triângulo Mineiro/ Alto Paranaíba and Vale do Mucuri regions were important regions, considering restriction of animal infectious disease spread in Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.