ArticlePloS one2025
Rapid, without focus stacking, 3D photogrammetric digitization of cockroaches.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Natural history collections are seen as treasure troves we need to both preserve and study. Campaigns of 2D and 3D digitization have emerged in numerous institutions as an opportunity to maximize specimen's diffusion while limiting the risk associated to their manipulation. 2D and especially 3D models can be used for various scientific purposes. Because of different obstacles (time, technical limitations, cost, etc.), the digitization of small and numerous objects, like insect specimens, remains to be improved. Among the existing options, photogrammetry is generally less expensive than µCT-scan, two of the main methods for digitizing objects, but it remains time-consuming for small objects because focus staking-which involves a multiplication of shots-is strongly recommended to increase the depth of field. Here, we present a fast and inexpensive photogrammetric pipeline that generates 3D models of cockroaches of sufficient quality for morphometric geometric analyses. By focusing on a region of interest in the specimens-identified according to the goal of the digitization-the depth of field is reduced by comparison with the one encompassing the whole specimen. Thus, we eliminated the need for focus stacking. We produced 3D models for 62 species and compared 13 of the photogrammetric 3D models qualitatively and quantitatively with those obtained from µCT-scans of the same 13 species. We conclude that the 3D models produced with our pipeline are of sufficient quality to perform geometric morphometric analyses, which will be published elsewhere in a companion paper. Despite a few limitations, we hope that our pipeline will generate opportunities for the study of small objects like insects, one of the most species-rich group on Earth and in natural history collections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.