ArticlePloS one2025
Biomechanical and neuromuscular differences between professional and varsity football players during countermovement and approach jumps.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative effects of exercise-based interventions on jump, linear sprint, and change-of-direction performance in female adolescent team-sport athletes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative Effects of Femoral Nerve Neurodynamic Techniques and Static Stretching on Quadriceps Muscle Mechanical Properties.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effects of neuromuscular training on stability in volleyball athletes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to compare lower-body kinematics, muscle activity, performance, and vertical ground reaction force (GRFz) metrics between professional and varsity Ecuadorian football players during countermovement jumps with arm swing (CMJAS) and approach jumps (AJ). These two jump types were selected because they closely reflect common football-specific movement patterns; CMJAS simulates vertical jumps with arm drive, while AJ mimics explosive jumping after a run-up. Forty athletes (20 professional, 20 varsity; equally distributed by sex) were assessed using synchronized motion capture, force plates, and surface electromyography. Professional males demonstrated greater force production efficiency, defined here as the ability to generate higher concentric average GRFz, higher braking peak GRFz, shorter movement durations, and higher rates of force development in the unloading, yielding and braking phases, while achieving similar jump heights and modified reactive strength index (RSI mod) to varsity players during CMJAS. However, they also experienced higher impact forces in the AJ. Among females, professionals outperformed varsity players in both jumps, achieving greater jump heights, higher RSI mod scores, and increased concentric average GRFz. They also exhibited higher landing impact forces, loading rates, and asymmetric vastus medialis mean activation during landing; patterns commonly associated with elevated injury risk. Across groups, joint range of motion (ROM) and muscle activation patterns varied by phase, with professionals generally showing more proximal muscle activation and neuromuscular control. Asymmetries in ROM and muscle activation were more pronounced among professional females, particularly during AJ, suggesting task-specific adaptations that may also influence injury susceptibility. These findings underscore the importance of a comprehensive biomechanical assessment to inform injury screening and targeted strategies for injury risk reduction in competitive football.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.