Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41325319›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Generation of severely scoliotic subject-specific musculoskeletal models.

Samuele Luca Gould, Giorgio Davico, Monica Cosentino, Luca Cristofolini, Marco Viceconti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samuele Luca GouldDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7140-0007
Giorgio DavicoDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2046-529X
Monica CosentinoMedical Technology Lab, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5508-9776
Luca CristofoliniDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7473-6868
Marco VicecontiDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Alma Mater Studiorum - University of Bologna, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2293-1530

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical correction of severe scoliosis has been associated with high rates of complications and reoperation rates. Patient outcomes could be improved with the use of personalised scoliotic spine models. To be clinically applicable, these models must be robust to operator variability, must accurately reflect the patient anatomy, and be rapidly generated. This study developed a semi-automatic pipeline for creating subject-specific models, and the inter- and intra-operator variability and model accuracy were assessed. An existing generic spine model was modified and morphed into a subject-specific spine model using manually performed virtual anatomical landmark palpations through a semi-automatic pipeline. The inter- and intra-operator variability of the virtual palpations was assessed, and the model was compared to the ground truth of a radiographic evaluation and segmentation of computed tomography data. The interclass correlation coefficient showed excellent inter- and intra-operator repeatability (>0.9). Although significant differences were found, they were not associated with specific anatomical landmarks. The mean inter- and intra-operator variability of the virtually palpated anatomical landmarks was 2 mm, and the maximum was 10.3 mm. The vertebral centres of the patient-specific model had maximum median errors of 10.3 mm. While the mean curvature of the model reflected the radiographic measurements, there were substantial deviations from the mean. The semi-automatic pipeline successfully created a subject-specific scoliotic spine model that included automatically adjusted muscle paths. The results indicated the process was robust to inter- and intra-operator variability but would benefit from full automation, particularly to improve the definition of the intervertebral joint.

Indexed as

Models, AnatomicScoliosisSpineAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID41325319
PMCPMC12668498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.