ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025
Bayesian reconstruction and differential testing of excised introns.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationCharacterizing the differential excision of introns is critical for understanding the functional complexity of a cell or tissue, from normal developmental processes to disease pathogenesis. Most transcript reconstruction methods infer full-length transcripts from high-throughput sequencing data. However, this is a challenging task due to incomplete annotations and the heterogeneous expression of transcripts across cell-types, tissues, and experimental conditions. Several recent methods circumvent these difficulties by considering local splicing events, but these methods lose transcript-level splicing information and may conflate similar, but distinct transcripts.
resultsIn this work, we formalize a new transcript reconstruction problem that interpolates between the full-length and local splicing perspectives by considering sequences of exon-exon junctions (SEEJs) that co-occur in transcripts. We then present a hierarchical Bayesian admixture model and posterior inference algorithms for computing SEEJs (BSEEJ), and a generalized linear model for characterizing differential SEEJ usage based on model parameter estimates. We show that BSEEJ achieves high F1 score for reconstruction tasks and improved accuracy and sensitivity in differential splicing when compared with six transcript and local splicing methods on simulated data. Lastly, we evaluate BSEEJ on experimental data based on transcript reconstruction, novelty of transcripts produced, model sensitivity to hyperparameters, and a functional analysis of differentially expressed SEEJs. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: BSEEJ is freely available at https://github.com/bayesomicslab/BSEEJ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.