ArticleScience progress
A hierarchical sub-modeling approach for the thermo-mechanical analysis of a TFT-FOPLP.
Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To address the critical challenge of thermo-mechanical stress in large-area thin-film transistor fan-out panel-level packaging (TFT-FOPLP), this study employs a finite-element modeling to investigate stress distribution from the panel to the device scale. A hierarchical sub-modeling methodology was used, starting with a homogenized global model to identify high-stress regions, followed by two levels of sub-models to resolve stresses in a single TFT cell under simulated thermal cool-down from fabrication temperatures. Results identified the highest stress concentrations at the corners of dies near the panel edge. At the device level, the analysis revealed that the critical gate insulator is subjected to a tensile stress of approximately 44.5 MPa and a strain of about 0.1%, a level sufficient to potentially alter electrical performance. Furthermore, other brittle dielectric layers, such as the passivation layer, were predicted to experience significantly higher stresses (approximately 407 MPa), indicating a primary risk of mechanical fracture. The study affirms the mechanical feasibility of the TFT-FOPLP concept but underscores the need for careful stress mitigation in vulnerable regions. The presented modeling framework provides a powerful tool for design-for-reliability by enabling the early prediction of high-stress zones, thereby reducing reliance on physical prototyping. Future work should focus on correlating these simulations with experimental electrical data to establish quantitative design rules for this promising technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.