Observational studyScience progress
Pre- and postfracture patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing periprosthetic femoral fractures after primary total hip arthroplasty-An observational study.
Observational study in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectivePeriprosthetic femoral fracture has become the most common reason for reoperation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) after undergoing surgery due to a periprosthetic femoral fracture.MethodsPatients registered with a periprosthetic femoral fracture in the surgical theater protocols and in advance included in an institutional quality register were included in the study. PROMs were compared for each patient before primary THA, at 3 and 12 months follow-up and at the endpoint after fracture surgery. The PROMs investigated were numeric rating scale pain, Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical Function Short-form (HOOS-PS) and Forgotten Joint Score.ResultsA total of 27 patients were included in the study. Pain level after periprosthetic fracture surgery were comparable to the pain level registered at 3 and 12 months after THA. The same were found for HHS and HOOS-PS. In addition, both pain scores, HHS and HOOS-PS were significantly improved after fracture surgery compared to before the primary THA.ConclusionsPain and function scores after periprosthetic surgery were comparable to the findings at 3 and 12 months follow-up after primary THA surgery. Despite a limited number of patients, the present study report unique results including PROMs both pre- and post-THA and after the periprosthetic femoral fracture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.