ArticleScience progress
Multi-view deviation detection under privacy for medical business processes: Enhancing patient-centered care via digital transformation.
Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deviation detection has emerged as a critical research focus for business processes, enabling enterprises to prevent fraud, monitor anomalies, and safeguard the security of processes and data, particularly in the medical field. Despite its importance, existing methods face significant limitations. Some approaches focus solely on control flow deviations while neglecting data-induced deviations, whereas others rely on specific data, risking the exposure of personal privacy information. Consequently, a major challenge lies in balancing data availability for deviation detection with the imperative of preserving data privacy and security. To address this challenge, this paper proposes a multi-view deviation detection method based on privacy protection. First, data attributes critical to business processes are extracted using a random field model. Next, an identity and purpose-based data matching algorithm ensures the security of user identities and validates the intended use of data for privacy protection. Furthermore, the business process activity view regulates legally permissible data operations, while decision logic analysis links processes and data through decision tables to detect deviations. Beyond detecting deviations within each perspective, this method uncovers hidden deviations arising from the interplay of business process, data flow, and privacy perspectives. The evaluation using real-world medical event data demonstrates the method's effectiveness. Notably, it outperforms existing approaches by accurately identifying deviations that other methods fail to detect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.