Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41324957›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Telemedicine Preexposure Prophylaxis Prescribing From a Large Online US Company.

Aaron J Siegler, Shi Hao Ernest Koh, Tristan Schukraft, Simon Mazzoni, Edwin Corbin-Gutierrez, Rupa R Patel, Patrick S Sullivan, Wenting Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aaron J SieglerDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Shi Hao Ernest KohDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Tristan SchukraftMISTR LLC, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Simon MazzoniMISTR LLC, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
Edwin Corbin-GutierrezNational Alliance of State & Territorial AIDS Directors, Washington, DC.
Rupa R PatelWhitman-Walker Health, Washington, DC.
Patrick S SullivanDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Wenting HuangDepartment of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

Funding

Improving telePrEP Initiation and retention Outcomes in the US: The MISTR+StudyR01AI200775 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Aaron Julius Siegler · 2026 to 2026
$1.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI200775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective in HIV prevention; telemedicine is a promising avenue for delivering PrEP care. Objective: To explore telemedicine delivery of PrEP care (telePrEP) by the largest telePrEP company in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective, single-arm cohort study used health record data of patients receiving telePrEP from MISTR LLC, a for-profit telehealth company, from November 27, 2018, to March 5, 2025. Patient characteristics and AIDSVu data were assessed to determine levels of PrEP use nationally. Retention in care was assessed for persons initiating PrEP in 2020, 2021, and 2022. Data were analyzed from March 5 to May 29, 2025. Exposure: Use of telePrEP. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving telePrEP among all patients receiving PrEP in the US. Persons were classified as PrEP users if they received at least 1 day of prescribed PrEP in a calendar year. Results: From 2018 through 2025, 162 422 unique patients received telePrEP prescriptions from the telehealth company. Patients were predominantly young (mean [SD] age, 33.3 [10.3] years) and male (156 255 of 162 417 [96%]). Of 162 406 patients with data available, 19 610 (12%) were African American or Black, 12 075 (7%) were Asian, 39 744 (25%) were Hispanic or Latino, 82 222 (51%) were White, and 8755 (5%) were of other race or ethnicity. Most had not previously used PrEP (57 597 of 74 860 [77%]), and more than one-third (58 761 of 162 403 [36%]) were uninsured. Most users (131 875 [81%]) opted for home laboratory specimen collection as part of their care. TelePrEP use increased substantially from 6443 patients in 2020 to 110 068 in 2024. TelePrEP as a proportion of all national PrEP use was 2% in 2020, 9% in 2022, and 19% in 2024. Retention in care was similar for cohorts starting in 2020, 2021, and 2022; 67% (16 716 of 24 976) to 73% (4571 of 6287) were retained in the calendar year after initiation, 42% (8408 of 19 916) to 43% (2732 of 6287) in the second year, and 32% (2043 of 6287) to 33% (6546 of 19 916) in the third year. Annual care reinitiation ranged from 2% to 5%. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that nearly 1 in 5 PrEP users in the US received their PrEP prescriptions from a single national telemedicine company in 2024. Most were new to PrEP and more than one-third were uninsured. TelePrEP provision benefits from facilitating policies such as Affordable Care Act coverage and the 340B Drug Pricing Program. The rapid growth and overall magnitude of telePrEP provision suggests that it is a critical part of HIV prevention infrastructure in the US that merits continued regulatory support.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisTelemedicineAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesYoung AdultAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID41324957
PMCPMC12670195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.