ReviewCurrent environmental health reports2025
Interrupted Time Series Analysis in Environmental Epidemiology: A Review of Traditional and Novel Modeling Approaches.
Review in Current environmental health reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- its2s: a Python package for two-stage interrupted time series analysis using machine learning.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewInterrupted time series (ITS) designs are increasingly used in environmental health to evaluate impacts of extreme weather events or policies. This paper aims to introduce traditional and contemporary ITS approaches, including machine learning algorithms and Bayesian frameworks, which enhance flexibility in modeling complex temporal patterns (e.g., seasonality and nonlinear trends) and spatially heterogeneous treatment effects. We present a comparative analysis of methods such as ARIMA, machine learning models, and Bayesian ITS, using a real-world case study: estimating excess respiratory hospitalizations during the 2018 wildfire smoke event in San Francisco. RECENT
findingsOur study demonstrates the practical application of these methods and provides a guide for selecting and implementing ITS designs in environmental epidemiology. To ensure reproducibility, we share annotated datasets and R scripts, allowing researchers to replicate analyses and adapt workflows. While focused on environmental applications, particularly acute exposures like wildfire smoke, the framework is broadly applicable to public health interventions. This work advances ITS methodology by integrating contemporary statistical innovations and emphasizing actionable guidance for causal inference in complex, real-world settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.