Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41324794›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical medicine2026

Considerations for Biosimilar Adoption in Pediatrics: A Scoping Review.

Elaine Lau, Alicia Koo, Han Byul Kang, Meredith Ames, Cheyenne Matinnia, Avram Denburg

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elaine LauDepartment of Pharmacy, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5G 1X8.ORCID 0009-0003-3624-7320
Alicia KooDepartment of Pharmacy, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5G 1X8.
Han Byul KangDepartment of Pharmacy, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5G 1X8.
Meredith AmesDepartment of Pharmacy, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5G 1X8.
Cheyenne MatinniaDepartment of Pharmacy, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5G 1X8.
Avram DenburgDivision of Haematology/Oncology, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada. Avram.denburg@sickkids.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe growing number of indications and patent expirations for biologic drugs has created opportunities for market expansion of biosimilars; however, biosimilar uptake in children has lagged behind adults. There is limited clinical evidence for the use of biosimilars in pediatrics, thereby creating uncertainty surrounding safety and efficacy in children. This scoping review sought to identify themes related to biosimilar adoption in pediatrics to inform decision-making at pediatric healthcare institutions in Canada and internationally.

methodsA review of the academic and grey literature relevant to pediatrics was conducted. The OVID Medline, Embase and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts databases were searched from inception to September 20, 2024. This was complemented by a search of the websites of major regulatory and health technology assessment (HTA) agencies internationally and select professional organizations impacted by biosimilars. Studies relevant to pediatrics that discussed considerations for institutional decision-making about biosimilar use were included. Studies written from the regulatory, payor or industry perspective about market entry, those not written in English or those focused solely on biosimilar use for non-pediatric indications were excluded. Study and patient characteristics and the type of biosimilar drug were extracted from the included studies. The aims, key findings and recommendations from these studies were summarized to determine preliminary themes, which were refined in consultation with institutional stakeholders.

resultsA total of 35 articles were included, of which 26 were pediatric specific or referred to pediatrics in the article. The other nine articles did not refer specifically to pediatrics but included general themes that were applicable to both adults and pediatrics. Results were categorized into 14 themes under two overarching categories. Substantive principles consisted of clinical trial evidence, real-world experience, regulatory approval, cost and affordability, availability of supply, suitability of dosage forms for pediatrics, societal values and health risks. Procedural principles consisted of approval body and stakeholder representation, interchangeability, inventory management, computerized physician order entry (CPOE) builds and maintenance, education, and follow-up and monitoring. The implications of the themes on pediatric institutional decision-making informed the development of a policy framework for biosimilar adoption in pediatrics.

conclusionsA key health-system gap in pediatric biosimilar adoption was identified. There is a need for robust pediatric efficacy and safety studies by industry during the product development stage prior to market approval. Sustained development of pharmacovigilance systems and patient registries will be important to generate more real-world evidence on interchangeability, validate extrapolation to off-label pediatric indications and enhance patient and provider confidence in biosimilars.

Indexed as

Biosimilar PharmaceuticalsPediatricsCanadaChildDecision MakingHumansBiosimilar Pharmaceuticals

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.