ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Single-port robotic surgery in gynecology: first experience in German-speaking countries using the Da Vinci SP system in benign andneoplastic diseases.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Emerging robotic platforms in gynecologic surgery: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Multidisciplinary Expert Perspectives on a Conceptual Autonomous Mini Surgical Robot for Gynecological Procedures: An Exploratory Qualitative Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Global research trends in robotic single-site and single-port gynecologic surgery: a bibliometric and visualization analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe Single-Port (SP) surgical system represents a significant advancement in robotic surgery, facilitating procedures through a single incision while overcoming the previously reported limitations of single-site surgery. As the first clinic in the German-speaking countries to use the da Vinci SP system for gynecological surgeries to treat benign and malignant diseases, we aim in this study to report our initial experiences and outcomes. PATIENTS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 62 patients who underwent gynecological surgeries using the da Vinci SP system. Various procedures were performed, patients diagnosed with both benign and malignant conditions were included in the study.
resultsWe performed hysterectomy (n = 31); hysterectomy with pectopexy (n = 6); pectopexy alone (n = 7); salpingo-oophorectomy (n = 12); myomectomy (n = 1); and endometriosis surgery (n = 5). The mean operation time was 136.2 ± 70.3 min. The mean docking time was 8.3 ± 2.2 min (range, 3-13). The mean hemoglobin level changed significantly by -0.93 ± 0.61 mmol/L (-1.53 ± 0.98 g/dL) (paired t-test, p < 0.001). No patients required blood transfusion. Notably, no patients developed incisional hernias following the operation. Two patients had minor postoperative complications. The mean hospital stay was 3.6 days ± 1.7 days with operative time as associative factor (+ 0.71 days per operative hour, p = 0.044).
conclusionOur initial experience demonstrates promising results with the use of the da Vinci SP system in gynecology. Single-port robotic surgery seems to be safe and offers several advantages over traditional multi-port systems, with the potential to complement existing platforms. However, it entails a new learning curve for surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.