Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41324686›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2025

Chimpanzees' working memory is not affected by the presence and activity of zoo visitors.

Aurélien Frick, Emma Suvi McEwen, Amanda M Seed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aurélien FrickSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Mary's Quad, St Andrews, KY16 9JP, UK. Asaf1@st-andrews.ac.uk.
Emma Suvi McEwenSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Mary's Quad, St Andrews, KY16 9JP, UK.
Amanda M SeedSchool of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Mary's Quad, St Andrews, KY16 9JP, UK.

Funding

Leverhulme Trust ECF-2023-573TWCF TWCF-2021-20648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive research in non-human primates is increasingly conducted in zoos, where zoo visitors are likely to be present and observe the testing sessions. Previous zoo research has shown that such presence can modulate cognitive performance in monkeys, but similar investigations on great apes are still lacking. Here, we investigated the influence of the presence and activity level of zoo visitors on eight chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) while they completed a working memory task with various difficulty levels. We also recorded whether their conspecifics were present or not in the testing area, and their approximate physical distance. We found that the presence and activity level of the visitors had no effect on chimpanzees’ working memory, regardless of the cognitive demands of the task. Similarly, the presence of conspecifics and how far they were from the individual being tested was not found to significantly influence performance either. These non-significant effects were supported by Bayesian analyses giving support for the null hypotheses. These results suggest that zoo-living chimpanzees are not distracted by visitors when completing a cognitive task. We suggest new directions to further explore social presence effects in great apes.

Indexed as

Animals, ZooMemory, Short-TermPan troglodytesAnimalsCognitionFemaleMaleSocial BehaviorChimpanzeesConspecifics’ presenceSocial presenceVisitors’ presenceWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID41324686
PMCPMC12774931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.