ArticleSurgery today2026
Clinical outcomes of adjuvant nivolumab following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: A single-center retrospective cohort study.
Article in Surgery today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Survival Outcomes of Adjuvant Nivolumab after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2026Article
- Early Initiation of Adjuvant Nivolumab After Esophagectomy Is Associated With Immune-related Liver Injury.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe CheckMate 577 trial revealed that adjuvant nivolumab administration following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery significantly improved the disease-free survival (DFS). However, evidence supporting its effectiveness following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery for advanced esophageal cancer remains limited. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of adjuvant nivolumab therapy in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 53 patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy for advanced esophageal cancer between 2021 and 2024 years. Patients were divided into the adjuvant nivolumab and non-adjuvant groups. Clinicopathological factors, surgical outcomes, adverse events, and survival rates were compared between the groups. We also investigated the association between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and survival outcome.
resultsOf the 53 patients, 15 (28%) received adjuvant nivolumab therapy. The DFS was significantly better in the adjuvant nivolumab group. In the multivariate analysis, although not significantly, adjuvant nivolumab was identified as a favorable prognostic factor. In total, 8 patients (53%) developed irAEs; those who developed irAEs and completed 1-year adjuvant nivolumab therapy showed a longer DFS than those without irAEs.
conclusionAdjuvant nivolumab therapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery may improve the DFS in patients with advanced esophageal cancer. Appropriate irAE management may support therapy completion and improve patient outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41324667What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.