Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41324651›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2026

Proton beam therapy versus trans-arterial chemoembolization for BCLC stage B hepatocellular carcinoma-a propensity-matched analysis.

Tzu-Ting Liu, Bing-Shen Huang, Yu-Ming Wang, Chieh-Min Liu, Eng-Yen Huang, Hsin-You Ou, Tsung-Hui Hu, Sheng-Nan Lu, Chao-Hung Hung, Yen-Hao Chen and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tzu-Ting LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology & Proton and Radiation Therapy Center, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Bing-Shen HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology & Proton and Radiation Therapy Center, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Yu-Ming WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology & Proton and Radiation Therapy Center, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chieh-Min LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology & Proton and Radiation Therapy Center, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Eng-Yen HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology & Proton and Radiation Therapy Center, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Hsin-You OuDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Tsung-Hui HuDivision of Hepatogastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Sheng-Nan LuDivision of Hepatogastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chao-Hung HungDivision of Hepatogastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Yen-Hao ChenSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chung-Shih ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology & Proton and Radiation Therapy Center, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. u780929@cloud.cgmh.org.tw.
Jen-Yu ChengDepartment of Radiation Oncology & Proton and Radiation Therapy Center, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. york480@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5080-0394

Funding

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Research Project CGRPG8N0011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeProton beam therapy (PBT) has a promising local control rate, but clinical data supporting its use for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains insufficient, and its survival benefit over transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has yet to be established. This study aimed to compare the two modalities by evaluating real-world survival outcomes.

methodsThe propensity score-matched (PSM) cohort study used data from a multi-institutional medical research database. Treatment-naïve patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B HCC who underwent PBT or TACE as monotherapy were enrolled. Baseline patient and tumor characteristics were used for matching. Overall survival (OS) and post-treatment albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade were assessed, and stratified analyses were performed to evaluate the heterogeneity.

resultsBetween January 2007 and December 2022, 4349 patients with BCLC‑B HCC were identified, 1172 of whom met the inclusion criteria (PBT: 68; TACE: 1104). The PSM cohort matched 340 patients (PBT: 68; TACE: 272). Cox regression analysis revealed a significant survival benefit in the PBT group (p = 0.032, hazard ratio (HR) 0.64, 95% CI 0.42-0.97). Liver function was assessed in terms of ALBI grade every 3 months for 12 months after treatment, and the proportion of patients who maintained better liver function was greater in the PBT group than in the TACE group (p = 0.006).

conclusionFor patients with BCLC‑B HCC who are suitable candidates for PBT, PBT preserves better liver function than TACE and provides superior OS.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularChemoembolization, TherapeuticLiver NeoplasmsProton TherapyAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPropensity ScoreSurvival RateTreatment OutcomeBCLC stage BHepatocellular carcinomaProton beam therapyTransarterial chemoembolization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.