ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2026
[Bridging research and practice in public health services: lessons learned from the EvidenzOGD trainee rotation program].
Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Bridging theory and practice: a qualitative interview study of barriers to and facilitators of research collaborations between academia and public health services in Germany.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionA science-based approach in local public health services (PHS) requires robust structures both for generating practice-relevant research and for integrating this knowledge into routine public health practice. To strengthen this interface, an academia-practice research consortium developed, piloted, and evaluated the part-time trainee-rotation program "EvidenzOGD."
methodsThe formative process evaluation of the six-month pilot was guided by a theory-based logic model and employed a mixed-methods design, including document analysis, standardized online surveys, and workshops. Findings were synthesized using method and data triangulation.
resultsTrainees and mentors reported substantial gains in competencies and identified impulses for anchoring sustainable evidence transfer. At the institutional level, new forms of cooperation and structural developments were initiated. At the same time, several areas for improvement emerged, including an overly short rotation period, high documentation workload, unclear role expectations, and coordination challenges. These issues were systematically addressed, leading to adaptations of key program components, such as the rotation structure, the implementation of a unified logbook, the expansion of the training modules, and the improved integration of the trainee research project. DISCUSSION: The program is considered a promising approach to promoting evidence-informed practice and strengthening institutional cooperation within the PHS. Its modular structure allows for flexible implementation in different local contexts. Future research should explore its long-term effects on competency development and the institutionalization of evidence-based approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.