ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2026
[Cooperation between science and practice in public health services: a systematic mapping from 2015 to 2024].
Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCollaboration between science and practice in the public health service (PHS) holds the potential to translate scientific findings into practice and to incorporate practice-oriented questions back into research. Existing collaborations can provide valuable insights into structural conditions. However, no systematic mapping has been conducted in Germany to date. The aim of this study was therefore to systematically identify and analyze science-practice collaborations within the German PHS. METHODOLOGY: In a structured screening process, various data sources from 2015 to 2024 were systematically searched: (i) Google™, (ii) conference abstract volumes, (iii) scientific databases, (iv) databases for grey literature, supplemented by (v) an online survey, (vi) snowballing, and (vii) input from the "EvidenzOGD" project consortium network. Identified collaborations were categorized according to structural characteristics and analyzed descriptively using frequency analyses stratified by subgroups.
resultsA total of 611 science-practice collaborations in the PHS were identified, most of them through conference contributions. The number of collaborations increased over the study period. Many focused on classical fields of PHS activities and were mainly implemented at the municipal level. Coordination was almost evenly distributed between academic institutions and PHS institutions, while implementation was predominantly located in western federal states.
conclusionThis mapping of science-practice collaborations provides a comprehensive overview of a complex and multifaceted landscape of collaboration. It offers a foundation for further in-depth analyses regarding facilitating and hindering factors of collaboration, for example, as well as a better understanding of thematic and geographical clustering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.