ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2026
[Work-related psychological stress in the public health service during and after the COVID-19 pandemic and measures for reduction].
Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe new normal following the COVID-19 pandemic is characterized by uncertainty for employees in the public health service (ÖGD), shaped by challenges such as geopolitical threats, climate change, potential future pandemics, and structural changes driven by digitalization. The present qualitative study examines work-related psychological stress factors among public health office employees during and after the COVID-19 pandemic as well as the effectiveness of measures implemented to counter these stressors.
methodsIn a participatory process between Bielefeld University and seven public health offices, 15 qualitative interviews conducted in autumn and winter 2023/2024 were analyzed using Mayring's qualitative content analysis. The public health employees were asked about stress factors in their daily work during and after the COVID-19 pandemic and were then invited to identify employer-initiated measures aimed at reducing these burdens and to assess their effectiveness.
resultsThe main stressors identified were excessive workload and tasks outside the employees' professional expertise that had emerged in the context of the pandemic. The measures implemented by employers were generally not well aligned with these burdens and therefore did not reduce them sustainably. Many respondents felt insufficiently prepared to act appropriately in future crises. However, expressions of authentic appreciation were consistently rated positively and perceived as relieving. DISCUSSION: Given the likelihood of future crises and ongoing transformations, the results highlight an urgent need for improved preparedness. Such efforts should place particular emphasis on addressing the needs and perspectives of employees within the ÖGD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.