ReviewAnnals of plastic surgery2026
Algorithmic Approach to Management of Complex Scalp and Calvarial Burn Injuries.
Review in Annals of plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundScalp burns pose a unique challenge to the reconstructive surgeon given the anatomical characteristics of the head and neck. This challenge is magnified in severe burn injuries extending to the calvarial bone. Several algorithms for scalp and calvarial reconstruction have been presented in the past. However, no consensus exists about the optimal reconstructive approach. Our aim is to develop a novel algorithm for scalp burn reconstruction based on the relevant literature as well as case observations from the growing multidisciplinary field of neuroplastic surgery.
methodsA literature review of articles on PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science focused on scalp and calvarial burn management was conducted. We also present relevant cases from our institution that demonstrate the neuroplastic surgery approach to reconstruction of complex burns in this region. An algorithmic approach based on relevant anatomy, reconstructive principles, and surgical techniques ranging from primary closure to cranioplasty to reconstruct scalp and skull defects following burns is proposed.
resultsA novel algorithmic approach based on the Harrison classification of injury was developed based on our literature review. We also present 2 relevant cases from our neuroplastic surgery practice. We determined that the initial and most important factor in scalp and calvarial management is the integrity of the pericranium. Other factors such as patient's compliance and cosmetic needs may also determine treatment approach.
conclusionsManagement of scalp burns can be simplified using an algorithmic approach. We anticipate this work will help guide and improve reconstructive management for scalp and calvarial burn patients for reconstructive surgeons, burn surgeons, and particularly surgeons in resource-poor settings faced with treating severe scalp and calvarial burns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.