Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41324572›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2026

NQO1 as a predictor of response to adjuvant GemCap treatment for pancreatic cancer.

Dylan Williams, Chandni Patel, Kate Murray, Lucy Oldfield, Benjamin Small, Lawrence N Barrera, Rachel O'Sullivan, James Birch-Ford, Anthony Evans, Fiona Campbell and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Dylan WilliamsLiverpool Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0008-8672-9818
Chandni PatelLiverpool Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5024-3420
Kate MurrayLiverpool Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0007-9088-6595
Lucy OldfieldLiverpool Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0839-402X
Benjamin SmallLiverpool Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5104-2150
Lawrence N BarreraLiverpool Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0000-1908-162X
Rachel O'SullivanLiverpool Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0008-7755-9888
James Birch-FordLiverpool Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Anthony EvansLiverpool Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8547-1730
Fiona CampbellLiverpool Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Pedro A Perez-ManceraLiverpool Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4483-5136
Christopher M HalloranLiverpool Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5471-4178
Daniel PalmerLiverpool Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7147-5703
William GreenhalfLiverpool Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1865-3195
Ian M CoppleDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Chris GoldringDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0003-9645-6394
Thilo HackertDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7012-1196
Richard JacksonLiverpool Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
John P NeoptolemosDepartment of General Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6201-7399
Christoph SpringfeldDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3843-101X
Markus W BüchlerDepartment of General Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christoph W MichalskiDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Paula GhanehLiverpool Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Eithne CostelloLiverpool Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0104-8992

Funding

Pancreatic Cancer Research Fund, Cancer Research UK TRANSPAN CA2116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNAD(P)H quinone dehydrogenase 1 (NQO1), a detoxification enzyme regulated by the Nrf2 cytoprotective pathway, is overexpressed in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). NQO1 levels are also influenced by the C609T single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). We hypothesized that elevated NQO1 would confer chemoresistance in PDAC and predict poor patient outcome.

methodsNQO1 tumor levels and germline C609T SNP status were assessed in archival samples from the European Study Group for Pancreatic Cancer (ESPAC) trials. NQO1 expression (H-score) was treated as continuous for survival regression analyses and dichotomized for visual summaries. Nrf2 or downstream gene induction was assessed in Nrf2 reporter mice or in PDAC cells following exposure to gemcitabine (Gem), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), or the capecitabine (Cap) metabolite 5-fluoro-5'-deoxyuridine (5'-DFUR). Colony formation following NQO1 depletion was assessed.

resultsNQO1 tumor levels correlated with germline C609T SNP status (P < .001). Contrary to our hypothesis, high NQO1 expression was associated with improved survival in ESPAC-4 patients randomized to GemCap (HR = 0.87 [95% CI = 0.751 to 0.999]; P = .049), and had no association to outcome in the Gem-only treated arm (HR = 0.98 [95% CI = 0.78 to 1.23]; P = .867). Including genotype data did not improve predictive model performance. Neither Gem nor 5-FU induced Nrf2 in vivo. At high concentrations, they suppressed Nrf2/NQO1 in PDAC cells, an effect not mitigated by co-treatment with 5'-DFUR. NQO1 depletion experiments revealed that NQO1 inhibits colony formation. The strongest inhibition was observed when NQO1-positive cells were co-treated with Gem and 5'-DFUR, supporting our clinical data from ESPAC.

conclusionHigh tumor NQO1 predicts better outcome following GemCap therapy.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalDeoxycytidineNAD(P)H Dehydrogenase (Quinone)Pancreatic NeoplasmsAnimalsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticBiomarkers, TumorCell Line, TumorChemotherapy, AdjuvantDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleFluorouracilGemcitabineGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticBiomarkers, TumorDeoxycytidineFluorouracilGemcitabineNAD(P)H Dehydrogenase (Quinone)NFE2L2 protein, humanNF-E2-Related Factor 2NQO1 protein, humanNqo1 protein, mouse

Identifiers

PMID41324572
PMCPMC13064515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.