Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41324553›Full record

Trial reportClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2026

Automated Imaging as an Adjunct to Serum and Clinical Biomarkers: A New Validated Prediction Tool for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Michael J Morris, Jessica Flynn, Binsheng Zhao, Aseem Anand, Karl Sjöstrand, Steven M Larson, Ashley M Regazzi, Gary V Borzillo, Autumn Park, Lawrence H Schwartz and 1 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00887198 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Abiraterone Acetate (CB7630) Plus Prednisone in Asymptomatic or Mildly Symptomatic Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorJanssen Research & Development, LLCRan2009 to 2017Enrolled1,088ConditionsProstate CancerArmsAbiraterone acetate, Placebo, Prednisone
NCT01949337 phase3unknown statusnot on this map

Phase III Trial of Enzalutamide (NSC# 766085) Versus Enzalutamide, Abiraterone and Prednisone for Castration Resistant Metastatic Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlliance for Clinical Trials in OncologyRan2014 to 2024Enrolled1,311ConditionsAdenocarcinoma of the Prostate, Hormone-resistant Prostate Cancer, Recurrent Prostate Cancer, Stage IV Prostate CancerArmsenzalutamide, abiraterone, prednisone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Michael J MorrisDepartment of Medicine, Genitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-9454-0096
Jessica FlynnDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-8310-6684
Binsheng ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0009-0009-9934-9141
Aseem AnandExini Diagnostics - a Lantheus Company, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9452-6094
Karl SjöstrandExini Diagnostics - a Lantheus Company, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0003-5451-5608
Steven M LarsonDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-6111-7507
Ashley M RegazziDepartment of Medicine, Genitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-6019-1852
Gary V BorzilloJohnson and Johnson Innovative Medicine, Spring House, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0009-0008-7287-8636
Autumn ParkDepartment of Medicine, Genitourinary Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-8428-0817
Lawrence H SchwartzDepartment of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-3923-1477
Glenn HellerDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-9217-8348

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Tumor Evolution and Changes in MetabolismP50CA086438 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI LARSON, STEVEN MARK · 2000 to 2015
$29.9M
Clinical Qualification of Imaging and Fluid-Based Tumor Monitoring Biomarkers for Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate CancerR01CA240759 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI MORRIS, MICHAEL J, SCHWARTZ, LAWRENCE H · 2020 to 2025
$4.3M
Center for Cancer Research (CCR) 1R01CA240759-01A1Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) BC-CSC NiP ProjectJohnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine (JJIM)NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA086438NCI NIH HHS R01 CA240759Prostate Cancer Foundation (PCF)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeContemporary prostate cancer prognostic models do not include imaging and generally are based on pretreatment parameters. We sought to develop an externally validated model that used novel quantification of soft-tissue and bone disease, integrated with standard clinical and serum biomarkers, at baseline and up to 6 months of treatment. EXPERIMENTAL

designTwo randomized phase 3 trials, Cougar COU-AA-302 (NCT00887198; for derivation) and Alliance A031201 (NCT01949337; for validation), were used to evaluate the added value of early on-treatment bone imaging and more than 1,000 radiomics features on CT, used in conjunction with clinical and serum biomarkers in first-line metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Predictive accuracy measures were computed to determine whether these early on-treatment biomarkers could reliably sort patients into risk groups that inform overall survival (OS) and whether the patient-specific biomarker risk score could precisely predict their OS time.

resultsImaging improved patient risk stratification but did not improve individual survival predictions. The strongest risk prediction model was developed for patients with bone-only metastases. This model was also the least complex, relying on just 16 risk factors, whereas all other models were high-dimensional, incorporating approximately 1,100 intercept and 1,100 slope features from the early on-treatment biomarker trajectories.

conclusionsPretreatment and early on-treatment serum and automated quantitative imaging markers can well discriminate risk of death. Imaging improves this risk categorization relative to serum biomarkers alone. Such models can give early outcome predictions and can be used in future trials that involve imaging, even using traditional techniques such as bone scintigraphy.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBone NeoplasmsProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantAgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPrognosisTomography, X-Ray ComputedBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID41324553
PMCPMC12758974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.