Trial reportClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2026
Automated Imaging as an Adjunct to Serum and Clinical Biomarkers: A New Validated Prediction Tool for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
Trial report in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Abiraterone Acetate (CB7630) Plus Prednisone in Asymptomatic or Mildly Symptomatic Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Phase III Trial of Enzalutamide (NSC# 766085) Versus Enzalutamide, Abiraterone and Prednisone for Castration Resistant Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeContemporary prostate cancer prognostic models do not include imaging and generally are based on pretreatment parameters. We sought to develop an externally validated model that used novel quantification of soft-tissue and bone disease, integrated with standard clinical and serum biomarkers, at baseline and up to 6 months of treatment. EXPERIMENTAL
designTwo randomized phase 3 trials, Cougar COU-AA-302 (NCT00887198; for derivation) and Alliance A031201 (NCT01949337; for validation), were used to evaluate the added value of early on-treatment bone imaging and more than 1,000 radiomics features on CT, used in conjunction with clinical and serum biomarkers in first-line metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Predictive accuracy measures were computed to determine whether these early on-treatment biomarkers could reliably sort patients into risk groups that inform overall survival (OS) and whether the patient-specific biomarker risk score could precisely predict their OS time.
resultsImaging improved patient risk stratification but did not improve individual survival predictions. The strongest risk prediction model was developed for patients with bone-only metastases. This model was also the least complex, relying on just 16 risk factors, whereas all other models were high-dimensional, incorporating approximately 1,100 intercept and 1,100 slope features from the early on-treatment biomarker trajectories.
conclusionsPretreatment and early on-treatment serum and automated quantitative imaging markers can well discriminate risk of death. Imaging improves this risk categorization relative to serum biomarkers alone. Such models can give early outcome predictions and can be used in future trials that involve imaging, even using traditional techniques such as bone scintigraphy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.