Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41324507›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2026

Integrated Representations of Threat and Controllability in the Lateral Frontal Pole.

Joanne E Stasiak, Jingyi Wang, Neil M Dundon, Elizabeth J Rizor, Christina M Villanueva, Parker L Barandon, Scott T Grafton, Regina C Lapate

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joanne E StasiakDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-3854-345X
Jingyi WangDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-7903-0952
Neil M DundonDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA.ORCID 0000-0001-6246-1775
Elizabeth J RizorDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-5833-4471
Christina M VillanuevaDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA.
Parker L BarandonDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA.ORCID 0009-0004-6014-7247
Scott T GraftonDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA.ORCID 0000-0003-4015-3151
Regina C LapateDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-1835-2309

Funding

Lateral prefrontal organization in emotion: representational and causal mechanismsR01MH134000 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI Regina C Lapate · 2023 to 2026
$2.0M
Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research ASAP-020-519NIMH NIH HHS MH134000NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH134000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotional processing is ubiquitous in everyday life, informing goal pursuit not only in response to current demands but also in anticipation of future outcomes. Lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) function supports cognitive control, and emerging evidence suggests a unique role for its anterior-most region-the lateral frontal pole (FPl)-in integrating putatively amygdala-originated emotion signals with goal information. However, whether these organizational properties of LPFC are expressed during the anticipation of future threat remains unknown. Here, we used finite impulse response modeling and pattern similarity analysis to examine dynamic engagement and representational properties of distinct LPFC regions during threat anticipation requiring goal-directed action. Healthy participants (n = 67, 51 female) were scanned during a threat-of-shock paradigm consisting of a prolonged (18 sec) countdown to possible shock administration. Threat unpleasantness and controllability were manipulated orthogonally: In controllable trials, participants could avoid an unpleasant or mild shock by making a successful time-sensitive response; in uncontrollable trials, shocks were administered regardless of performance. LPFC robustly coded for anticipated threat unpleasantness, with FPl showing the strongest modulation by threat unpleasantness and controllability relative to caudal and mid-LPFC regions. While caudal and mid-LPFC maintained independent representations of threat unpleasantness and controllability, FPl held conjunctive threat-and-controllability representations, which were associated with successful motor performance following unpleasant threat anticipation. Stronger conjunctive FPl representations were also associated with greater inverse amygdala-FPl coupling. Together, these findings provide insight into LPFC organization under naturalistic emotional challenges and highlight a key role for FPl in integrating affective and control-related information during threat anticipation to support goal-directed action.

Indexed as

Anticipation, PsychologicalEmotionsExecutive FunctionFearPrefrontal CortexAdolescentAdultBrain MappingFemaleGoalsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePsychomotor PerformanceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41324507
PMCPMC12948140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.