Observational studyJournal of advanced nursing2026
Consultations Within School Health Services: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.
Observational study in Journal of advanced nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study aims to (1) describe the content of consultations within school health services, (2) outline school nurses' assessments, and (3) identify factors that influence the duration of consultations.
designA cross-sectional observational study was conducted.
methodsThe data were collected in Norway during November 2023 using a self-report form by school nurses (n = 96). Consultations (n = 382) were registered and analysed using descriptive statistical methods and multiple linear regression analyses to identify factors influencing the duration of consultations.
resultsNearly 30% of the pupils had to wait for a consultation and 29% of the registered consultations were drop-in. School nurses had to prioritise due to limited time in 41% of the consultations. Mental health was the predominant theme. Several adverse factors, such as interruptions during consultations, affected the time spent.
conclusionThis study provides knowledge about the content of consultations within school health services in Norway, contributing to the enhancement of this activity within these services. IMPLICATIONS FOR PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: The insights from this study may serve as a foundation for developing guidelines for consultations, helping to ensure equitable support for all children and adolescents. IMPACT: To our knowledge, this is the first study that gives a broad insight into consultations within the Norwegian school health services. Having enough resources is essential for providing good services. Politicians and central authorities need to consider this when deciding on budgets. REPORTING
methodThis study adhered to STROBE guidelines for reporting cross-sectional studies. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public involvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.