SynthesisPsychophysiology2025
Emotion Reactivity and Regulation in Autistic Adults: A Systematic Review Across RDoC Units of Analysis.
Synthesis in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Emotion Reactivity and Regulation in Autistic Adults: A Systematic Review Across RDoC Units of Analysis.Psychophysiology · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emotion reactivity and regulation are implicated in the experience of anxiety and depression by autistic adults, but their measurement has been hindered by reliance on subjective judgment. Biological measurement methods may improve insight by offering a perspective beyond self/other-report. Using PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review aimed to (1) clarify current emotion reactivity and regulation measurement practices used with autistic adults, and (2) summarize conclusions on the autistic adult experience, organized across Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) units of analysis (circuits, physiology, behavior, self-/caregiver-report). Of the 31 original peer-reviewed studies that met inclusion criteria, there were 41 different reports: 15 circuitry, 13 physiological, one behavioral, and 14 self-/caregiver-reports of emotion reactivity and/or regulation. Findings generally indicated reduced emotion reactivity and emotion regulation processes for autistic adults compared to non-autistic groups, but inconsistencies emerged depending upon the emotional paradigms, social stimuli, laboratory versus naturalistic setting, sample characteristics, or RDoC measurement tools used. Overall, study design heterogeneity has limited the ability to infer how emotion reactivity and regulation are measured and, therefore, impacted in autistic adults. Future studies should establish standard methods across multiple measurements, assess both positive and negative emotions, and include diverse racial/cultural backgrounds and ability levels. In conclusion, there remains a dearth of evidence using circuitry, physiological, and behavioral measures of emotion reactivity and regulation in autistic adults, thus limiting our understanding of these critical internal experiences and processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.