Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41324242›Full record

ArticleJournal of personality2026

From Personality to Pour: How Consumer Traits Shape Wine Preferences and Alcohol Choices.

Xi Wang, Jie Zheng, Yiqi Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personality, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xi WangCulture, Creativity and Management, School of Culture and Creativity, Beijing Normal-Hong Kong Baptist University, Zhuhai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0566-5357
Jie ZhengCollege of Shanghai Lausanne Hospitality Management, Shanghai Business School, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8342-8197
Yiqi WangSchool of Tourism and Social Management, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

Department of Education of Guangdong Province: UICR0400019-23Guangdong and Hong Kong Universities "1+1+1" Joint Research Collaboration Scheme : 2025A0505000008.Guangdong Office of Philosophy and Social Science GD25YSG29Zhuhai Federation of Social Sciences: 2025YB014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aims to examine how personality traits influence consumer preferences for wine alcohol content (ABV), an area that remains underexplored in wine marketing research.

methodDrawing on the Big Five Personality Traits framework, this study employed natural language processing (NLP) and BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) to infer personality traits from 9917 consumer reviews collected from an e-commerce wine platform. A beta regression model was then used to analyze the relationship between inferred personality traits and wine ABV preferences.

resultsThe results reveal that openness and agreeableness are positively associated with higher ABV preferences, while extraversion and neuroticism show negative associations. Conscientiousness did not exhibit a significant relationship with ABV preferences.

conclusionsThe findings indicate that personality traits significantly shape consumer evaluations of wine intensity and validate the predictive power of AI-based personality inference. This research contributes to consumer behavior theory and offers practical implications for developing personalized wine recommendations and targeted marketing strategies in digital retail environments.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorConsumer BehaviorPersonalityWineAdultFemaleHumansMalealcohol contentBERTconsumer behaviorpersonality traitswine preference

Identifiers

PMID41324242
PMCPMC13359324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.