ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
Exploring Explainable Machine Learning for Predicting and Interpreting Self-Reported Diabetes among Tennessee Adults: Insights from the 2023 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating epidemiologic modeling and explainable machine learning to predict and identify factors associated with self-reported depression among adults in Tennessee, United States.Discover mental health · 2026Article
- Explainable Meta-Learning Ensemble Framework for Predicting Insulin Dose Adjustments in Diabetic Patients: A Comparative Machine Learning Approach with SHAP-Based Clinical Interpretability.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Public health risk stratification using hybrid machine learning: a reproducible analysis of performance, stability, and risk attribution.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiabetes remains a major public health concern in the United States, particularly in Tennessee, where prevalence rates exceed national averages. Traditional statistical approaches may not fully capture the non-linear interactions among predictors. This study applied both traditional approaches and machine learning (ML) techniques to predict and identify key contributing factors associated with self-reported diabetes using the 2023 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) dataset.
methodsA cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 5634 (weighted population 5 614 486) adults from the Tennessee BRFSS dataset. Sociodemographic, behavioral, and health-related variables were analyzed. Data processing, exploratory analysis, and modeling were performed in Python using Pandas, NumPy, Scikit-learn, and SHAP. Seven algorithms were tested: Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and XGBoost, with stratified 5-fold cross-validation. Models were evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, balanced accuracy, F1-score, AUROC, and PR-AUC.
resultsThe Gradient Boosting model demonstrated the best overall performance, achieving an accuracy of 82%, precision of 48%, recall of 32%, F1-score of 37%, AUROC of 0.80, and PR-AUC of 0.45. Key predictors included high blood pressure, high cholesterol, body mass index, comorbidity burden, and physical inactivity. SHAP analysis revealed that both clinical factors and social determinants substantially influenced diabetes risk.
conclusionThis study highlights the strong potential of machine learning, particularly Gradient Boosting, in predicting self-reported diabetes. Integrating SHAP analysis enhanced interpretability by revealing how the above factors interact to influence diabetes risk, underscoring the value of explainable AI for precision public health and targeted prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.