ArticleJournal of primary care & community health
A Theory Informed Multi-Component Intervention to Promote Family Medicine Provider PrEP Prescription to Adolescent Girls and Young Women in the U.S. Southeast: Pilot Trial Results.
Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdolescent girls and young women (AGYW) in the U.S. Southeast are disproportionately affected by HIV. We developed and piloted PrEP-Pro, an intervention to support family medicine residents to prescribe HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), with a focus on AGYW. We pilot-tested the intervention, evaluating feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness.
methodsUsing intervention mapping, we developed sexual history training, PrEP curricula, and a PrEP champion program. For the 6-month pilot test, we trained PrEP champions who trained and supported residents at their sites. Participating physicians completed enrollment and exit questionnaires capturing PrEP provision experiences, attitudes/skills/barriers to completing a sexual history, and PrEP knowledge/attitudes/beliefs. Exit questionnaires assessed PrEP-Pro acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness. We compared enrollment and exit scores on sexual history assessment, PrEP knowledge, and provider behaviors.
resultsAmong 46 participants (median age = 29 years), 57% were men, 59% were White, 15% were Asian, 11% were Latinx, and 7% were Black. Among 32 (70%) participants completing both enrollment and exit questionnaires, we observed significant increases in sexual history skills, PrEP knowledge, and PrEP attitudes, and non-significant increases in the proportion reporting routine sexual history assessment and HIV testing. On a 5-point scale, feasibility (mean 4.28 (SD = 0.42), acceptability (4.31 (0.53)), and appropriateness (4.25 (0.46)) scores were high with respect to the PrEP-Pro intervention.
conclusionThis multi-component intervention was feasible, acceptable, and appropriate for family medicine residents in the pilot. Pre- and post-evaluation suggest participation in the intervention increased PrEP knowledge and improved sexual history-taking. These findings suggest that the intervention could successfully enhance provider self-efficacy in delivering sexual health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.